19,998 XRP BIS Slide: A Test Fuel Gauge, Not a Bank Minimum
The viral 19,998 XRP figure comes from a BIS research slide. Here is what the N = T / F box, the DevNet stamp and real XRP Ledger fees show.

Key takeaways
- The 19,998 XRP figure on the slide is the fee budget for about 20 billion test transactions, not a minimum any bank must hold.
- Page 7 is stamped 'Personal Measurements' and 'Local Tests + DevNet', and according to the video the paper says every run used the XRP Ledger DevNet, where fees are paid in test XRP with no value.
- On the real XRP Ledger, 20 billion transactions at the 10-drop minimum fee would burn about 200,000 XRP, which the video values at roughly $260,000 at $1.30 per XRP.
- The video estimates that running the fingerprinting setup for real would need about 2 XRP in account reserves plus small fees, and argues this does not amount to bank-sized demand.
- Before acting on a viral number, find the original page, read its stamps and footnotes, and ask whether XRP is the fuel or the cargo.
A viral claim says banks will need a minimum of 19,998 XRP, citing a slide by researchers at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). The slide is real, but it does not say that. According to the Bullrunners video, 19,998 XRP is the fee budget for about 20 billion test transactions on a practice network. It is not a holding requirement for banks.
This matters if you hold XRP because you expect banks to buy it. The video says the number spread under a YouTube title that 46,000 people saw over one weekend. Reading the page itself takes about a minute, and it changes what the number means.
Where did the 19,998 XRP slide come from?
The slide is page 7 of a presentation given in Rome on October 1, 2025. The event was the 10th SDMX Global Conference, hosted by the Bank of Italy. SDMX is a standard for exchanging statistical data, and the conference brings together people who produce and use that data. The video describes the audience as government statisticians. The deck was shown in Session 8, titled “SDMX Applications Outside the Statistical World,” which looked at using the SDMX standard beyond official statistics.
The conference programme lists six authors for the talk, from the BIS and the consulting firm d-fine. They were working on a practical problem. Governments publish official figures such as inflation, jobs and GDP. Once a file like that is copied around the internet, how can anyone confirm that nobody changed a digit?
Their answer was a cryptographic fingerprint. This is a short code calculated from a file that changes if any part of the file changes. The project takes each official file, creates a fingerprint, bundles the fingerprints together and writes a tiny proof onto the XRP Ledger. The file itself never goes onchain. The video says anyone can later check their copy against the recorded fingerprint in about two seconds.
The video treats the choice of ledger as the real news. In its view, the researchers picked the XRP Ledger, ran their own code on it, and it worked. For more on the paper, see Bullrunners’ article on what BIS Paper 1374 says about the XRP Ledger.
How did a test slide become a shopping list?
The slide drew little outside attention for about 11 months. The video lays out the five days that changed that:
- September 2, 2026: The BIS publishes the full write-up as Working Paper No 1374. It lists five authors. The video says the paper is 56 pages long and that four authors are from the BIS and one from a consulting firm. The paper states that its references to firms and projects are illustrative.
- September 4: Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse posts on X: “Is it any surprise that BIS is testing with XRPL.. low fees (check) fast settlement (check) and proven track record (check).” The video calls this a fair brag, but a brag about a test.
- September 5: According to the video, Alex Jones tells his audience that XRP has been chosen by the majority of globalist banks, institutions and governments. Bullrunners has a separate fact check of the claim that banks chose XRP.
- September 6: A YouTube channel finds the Rome slides and posts a video whose title says banks will need a minimum of 19,998 XRP. The video reports 46,000 views.
- September 7: The same channel scales the chart up to 25% of world payments and says institutions would need to hold about 547,000 XRP a year.
The video’s point is that a paper about fingerprinting spreadsheets became a buying story built on one word, “hold.” The chart never uses that word.
What does the box next to the chart say?
The box beside the chart gives a simple formula: N = T / F. N is the number of transactions, T is the total XRP in the two test accounts, and F is the fee per transaction. The chart is titled “number of transactions versus total XRP.” It assumes a fee of 0.000001 XRP, one millionth of a coin.
| XRP in the test accounts | Transactions it pays for (at 0.000001 XRP each) |
|---|---|
| 198 XRP | 198 million |
| 1,998 XRP | About 2 billion |
| 19,998 XRP | About 20 billion |
The video compares the chart to a fuel gauge. It shows how far the test could run on a tank of a given size. On this reading, the 19,998 figure is the fuel a test would burn, not coins a bank must own.
What about the 52,000 euros?
The euro figures next to the chart are the price of that fuel on one day. Per the video, 198 XRP was worth about 515 euros on September 12, 2025, the date printed on the chart. That works out to about 2.60 euros per coin, which the video puts at roughly $3.05 at that day’s exchange rate. On the same basis, 19,998 XRP comes to about 52,000 euros. It is still a fuel cost, not a purchase.
What do the “Personal Measurements” and “DevNet” stamps mean?
According to the video, the two stamps mark the numbers as one researcher’s own small test, not results from a live network or a position of the BIS as an institution. Page 7 carries the red label “Personal Measurements” on one side and “Local Tests + DevNet” on the other.
DevNet is a practice copy of the XRP Ledger. It runs on test XRP that is handed out free and has no real-world value, and fees there are paid in that test XRP. The video says page 27 of the paper confirms that every run took place on DevNet from a single developer workstation. So the test that produced the 19,998 number did not spend 19,998 real XRP, or even one real XRP. The chart shows what the runs would cost in fees at an assumed 0.000001 XRP each. That is one-tenth of the real network’s minimum fee.
The video also points to standard wording in the paper. It says page 2 states the views are the authors’, not the BIS’s, and page 3 says naming the XRP Ledger is not an endorsement. The video then plays a clip of another BIS project describing its work as proofs of concept that test whether something can function. A test like that is not a decision to adopt the technology.
What would it cost on the real XRP Ledger?
On the live network, the same 20 billion transactions would burn about 200,000 XRP. The video values that at around $260,000. The minimum transaction fee on the live ledger is 10 drops. A drop is one millionth of an XRP, so the fee is 0.00001 XRP. That fee is not paid to anyone. It is destroyed, a process covered in Bullrunners’ guide to how the XRP fee burn works.
The video puts the numbers in context, using a price of $1.30 per XRP:
- All fees since 2012: The video reports 14,416,745 XRP burned as of October 26, 2026. That is about $18.7 million over 14 years.
- Compared with escrow: Ripple unlocks 1 billion XRP from escrow on the first of each month and usually puts much of it back. Fourteen years of fees equal about 1.4% of a single month’s unlock.
- The slide’s 20 billion transactions at the real fee: About 200,000 XRP, or around $260,000.
- The 547,000 XRP a year claim: About $711,000, using the $1.30 price the video cites for October 25, 2026. That is spread across the whole banking system for a year.
A speaker in the video also points out a tension. Many XRP holders praise the ledger for costing fractions of a cent per transaction. The video’s argument is that the same low cost makes it hard for fees alone to drive demand for the coin.
How much XRP would a bank actually need to hold?
Very little, according to the video. Every XRP Ledger account must keep a reserve. This is a small deposit that stops the network filling up with junk accounts. The current reserve is 1 XRP per account plus 0.2 XRP for each extra object the account owns. For the details, see Bullrunners’ explainer on the XRP account reserve.
The slide says the test used two accounts. That means about 2 XRP held in reserve, roughly $2.60 at $1.30, plus fees burned as transactions are made. At the real minimum fee, 1 XRP covers 100,000 fingerprint postings. The video concludes that a central bank running this exact system for real would need two coins in reserve and a few coins a year in fees.
Does this mean banks aren’t using XRP?
It means this slide is not evidence that they are. The video describes the bank adoption thesis as “not dead, just measured.” It plays a clip of Garlinghouse, which the video dates to February 2026, discussing GTreasury. Ripple bought the treasury software company and renamed it Ripple Treasury. In the clip, he says it handled about $13 trillion of payments the previous year, and none of those payments used crypto or a stablecoin.
The video separates two things: a bank using the ledger to record a fingerprint, and a bank moving its money through XRP. In the video’s account, the first happened on a practice network in 2025. The second has not happened yet.
The video also notes something the creator of the September 6 video said at around minute five. He told viewers the chart does not mean every bank needs 19,000 XRP. In the video’s words, he read the slide correctly, but the title did not.
A three-step check for viral XRP numbers
The video ends with a routine for checking any number like this before acting on it:
- Find the page itself. Read the original document, not a video about it. The conference deck and the BIS paper are both public PDFs.
- Read the stamps and footnotes. Here, “Personal Measurements,” “Local Tests + DevNet” and the not-an-endorsement line were printed for exactly this reason.
- Ask whether the coin is the fuel or the cargo. Fuel is burned a fraction at a time. Cargo is what someone has to buy and hold. The video says XRP has been the fuel in every BIS document so far.
What to watch next
The open question is whether any central bank or statistics agency moves this fingerprinting prototype onto the live XRP Ledger. The paper calls it a prototype. According to the video, as of October 26, 2026, nobody has said otherwise. If a live deployment is announced, the same math applies. Check how many accounts it uses and what it burns in fees, then compare that with claims about what banks must “hold.”
Sources
- BIS Working Paper No 1374 (September 2, 2026)
- BIS Working Paper No 1374, PDF
- SDMX Global Conference deck, Session 8, page 7 (Rome, October 1, 2025)
- SDMX Global Conference programme
- XRPL documentation: transaction cost
- XRPL documentation: reserves
- Bitcoin.com: Garlinghouse on BIS testing the XRPL (September 2026)
Frequently asked questions
Does the BIS say banks need 19,998 XRP?
No. The slide shows that 19,998 XRP would pay the fees for about 20 billion test transactions at an assumed fee of 0.000001 XRP. It is a fuel calculation for a research test, not a holding requirement.
What is BIS Working Paper 1374 about?
Published on September 2, 2026, the paper describes a prototype that fingerprints official statistics files and writes a tiny cryptographic proof onto the XRP Ledger. The video says it runs to 56 pages. Anyone can then check that their copy of a file has not been altered.
Did the BIS test spend real XRP?
According to the video, no. It says page 27 of the paper reports that every run took place on the XRP Ledger DevNet from a single developer workstation. DevNet fees are paid in free test XRP that has no real-world value.
How much XRP has been burned in fees on the XRP Ledger?
The video reports 14,416,745 XRP destroyed in fees since 2012, as of October 26, 2026. At the video's price of $1.30 per XRP, that is about $18.7 million. It is roughly 1.4% of one monthly 1 billion XRP escrow unlock.
Where does the 547,000 XRP a year claim come from?
A YouTube channel scaled the BIS chart up to an assumed 25% of world payments and said institutions would need to hold about 547,000 XRP a year. The video notes this is about $711,000 at $1.30, and argues it would be fuel that gets burned rather than coins that are held.
Full video transcript
From the video's captions, lightly formatted. Captions can mishear names and numbers, so check figures against the article above.
That is 19,998 XRP and the BIS values that approximately 52,000 euros on this slide.
19,998 XRP. That's September 6th, 2026. A man is reading a number off a slide from the Bank for International Settlements, the bank the central banks use. By the end of that weekend, 46,000 people had watched him do it under a title that said banks will need a minimum of 19,998 XRP. The number is real.
It's on page seven. But the slide he's reading is 11 months old. It was shown in a conference room in Rome and the people in that room were government statisticians. Not one of them was there to buy the coin. If you hold XRP because you were told the banks picked it, this looked like the receipt you'd been waiting for.
The slide says something different. So the question is, what did that page actually tell the room in Rome and how did it take 11 months and one YouTube title to turn into a shopping list? By the end of this, you'll be able to read it yourself because there are two stamps printed on that page that nobody in those videos read out loud. So if you're feeling bullish, like this video and smash that subscribe button. We're on our way to 400,000 subscribers.
We're at 396,000. So make sure you smash that subscribe today. And if you're going to be the first millionaire in your family tree, make sure you confirm that by commenting 777 down below. And I'm also giving away my 2026 altcoin trading strategies and crypto yield generation briefing to everyone who follows us on Instagram. You can find us @bullrunnershq and the official link will actually be in the description below this video.
Let's run it. All right, Bull Runners, welcome back. I'm Ryan Huggins, aka @winwithryan. Now, to see why one chart moved 46,000 people, you have to see the week it landed in.
And XRP has been chosen by the majority of globalist banks and institutions and governments to be the main mode of exchange.
That's Alex Jones, September 5th, 2026, the day before the slide video, telling his audience XRP has been chosen by the globalist banks. A lot of you have believed some version of that for years. The thesis, in its own best words, the banks need a bridge coin, the ledger is built for it, and one day the paperwork will show up. And you're probably thinking, "I've heard the banks are coming since 2018. Why would one slide change anything?" It wouldn't.
But when you already believe the banks picked the coin, a BIS chart with XRP on the axis isn't data, it's confirmation. And confirmation doesn't get read, it gets shared. So, here's where the chart actually came from, Rome. A conference for government statisticians hosted by the Bank of Italy. Session eight, the one about using these tools outside of statistics.
Five people had a problem to show the room. Governments publish numbers, inflation, jobs, GDP. Once a file like that gets copied around the internet, how do you know nobody changed a digit?
They're taking the official file, creating a cryptographic fingerprint of it, and a bundle of each of those fingerprints together, and write only a tiny proof of that onto the XRP ledger.
Their answer was a fingerprint. Take the file, make a fingerprint of it, and write that tiny fingerprint onto a public ledger. The file never goes on chain. Later, anyone can check their copy against the fingerprint in about 2 seconds. And they made a choice.
Out of every ledger they could have tested, they picked the XRP ledger. That's the real thing in the story. A serious institution ran its own code on this ledger and it worked. But the room in Rome didn't buy a coin. They went home and for 11 months nobody outside that room looked at page seven.
Then the clock started. September 2nd, 2026, the BIS publishes the full write-up as working paper number 1374. 56 pages. Same five authors, four from the BIS and one from a consulting firm
September 2nd marks the release as BIS working paper 1374. The paper presents the author's view and says it references to firms and projects are illustrative.
September 4th, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse posts, "Is it any surprise that BIS is testing with XRPL? Low fees? Check. Fast settlement? Check." A fair brag, but a brag about a test.
September 5th, Alex Jones, you just heard him. September 6th, somebody finds the Rome slides.
I need you to pay a very close attention to this slide because I think there is one part of this BIS presentation that almost everybody's overlooking, okay?
He says there's one part of this presentation everybody's overlooking and he's right that there is. But the part that he puts in the title is "Banks will require a minimum of 19,998 XRP." 46,000 views. September 7th, the next morning,
So, if we were to capture 25% uh that's about 547,000 XRP, ladies and gentlemen, on a year that these institutions would need to hold.
Same channel, one day later, scales the chart up at 25% of world's payments, he says, "The institutions would need to hold about 547,000 XRP a year." Five days, a 56-page paper about fingerprinting spreadsheets become a shopping list for the banking system. And if you bought that week, you bought it on strength of one word, hold. So, let's read the box next to the chart because the chart never said hold. Page seven has a chart. The title of the chart is number of transactions versus total XRP.
And in brackets, it says the fee it assumed 0.000001 XRP. One millionth of a coin per transaction. There's a box next to the chart. It says N = T / F. N is the number of transactions, T is the total XRP in both test accounts, F is the fee.
So, 198 XRP pays for 198 million transactions. 1,998 XRP pays for about 2 billion and 19,998 XRP pays for about 20 billion. That's the whole slide. It's a gas gauge. How far can this test car go on a tank that size?
So, the number everybody quoted is how much fuel the test would burn, not how much any bank has to own. It was never a minimum, it was a tank. And that's the whole job, honestly, reading the box next to the chart before you move money on it. It's what we do with our clients inside of SGS system at Altcoin Pro. We go page by page on what they already own.
And the links below in the description if you'd rather not read 56-page central bank papers by yourself. And you're probably thinking, but it says 52,000 euros right there, and that's real money. It is, but the euro figures next to the chart are just the price of the gas that day. 198 XRP was about 515 euros on September 12th of 2025, the date printed on the chart. And that's 2 euros, 60 a coin, about $3.05 at that day's exchange rate.
So, 52,000 euros is what a full tank costs at that day's pump price. It's still fuel, and there's a second thing on that page printed in red that says whose tank it was. Printed across page seven titled in red personal measurements. And on the other side, local test plus Devnet. Devnet is a practice copy of the XRP ledger.
The coins on it aren't real, and the fees on it cost nothing.
But look at the test conditions on page 27. A single developer workstation. XRP ledger Devnet, not mainnet, for every run.
The paper says the same thing on page 27. Every run was on Devnet from one developer's workstation. So, the test that produced the 19,998 number did not spend 19,998 XRP. It did not spend one XRP cuz it's a fee-free Devnet. The chart is what it would have cost if the test had been run for real on a fee 1/10 of the real networks.
That's what the stamp is for. It's a researcher telling the room, "These are my numbers from my laptop. Don't quote them as the banks." But a stamp from one researcher is one thing. What does the bank itself say a test like this is?
The project consists of two proof-of-concepts. Both test the functional feasibility of settling tokenized assets, [music] which are traded and settled on the six-digit exchange in central bank money.
That's the BIS on a different project describing what these tests are. They check whether a thing can work. They are not a decision to use it. Page two says the views are the authors, not the BIS's. Page three naming the XRP ledger is not an endorsement.
Those two sentences are on every BIS working paper, and they're there so a slide from one of them can't be read as policy. Now, put a dollar sign on it because this is where shopping list falls apart. On the real XRP ledger, the minimum fee as of October 26th, 2026 is 10 drops. A drop is a millionth of a coin. So, that's 0.00001 XRP.
The ledger's own documents say the fee is not paid to anybody, it's destroyed. And I pulled the ledger on October 26th, 2026, since the day it started in 2012, every fee on every transaction ever made adds up to 14,416,745 XRP destroyed. At a $1.30 about $18.7 million in 14 years. Ripple unlocks 1 billion XRP on the first of every month. 14 years of fees is about 1 and 1/2% of the 1 month unlock.
So, even if the slides 20 billion transaction all happened on the real network's fee, that's 200,000 XRP burned. That's $260,000 at a $1.30. Nobody's price goes anywhere on $260,000. And 547,000 XRP, the day two number, at a $1.30 on October 25th, 2026 is about $711,000 for the whole banking system for a year. That's less than one branch manager's house in a lot of cities.
And you're probably thinking, "Fine, but if a bank runs this for real, it still needs an account and an XRP account is needed." True. And here's how much. The XRP ledger makes every account park a deposit, so the network doesn't fill up with junk. As of October 26th, 2026, that deposit is 1 XRP per account, plus 0.2 XRP for each extra thing the account owns on the ledger. The slide says the test used two accounts.
So, two XRP parked, call it $2.60 at a $1.30. Then the fees on top destroyed as you go. On the real network, one XRP he for 100,000 of these fingerprint postings. That's the real shopping list for a central bank that wanted to run this exact thing for real. Two coins down and a few coins a year of gas.
If you hold 10,000 XRP, you could fund it yourself. So, it is interesting to hear people talk about the fact that gas fees could help the XRP price increase over time, but at the same time, all we do is XRP army is talk about how cheap it is to run XRP. I mean, it costs fractions of a cent to use it as a transaction. So, it's kind of a double standard, double-edged sword here. So, where does that leave the thesis then?
Not dead, just measured.
G Treasury is the name of the company now called Ripple Treasury, but they processed about or orchestrated about 13 trillion dollars of payments last year.
Wow.
Zero of those payments were crypto-enabled, zero of those payments were stablecoin-enabled.
That's Ripple's own CEO in February of 2026. The treasury company Ripple bought moved about 13 trillion dollars of payments the year before, zero of it through crypto, zero through a stablecoin. That's the honest size of the gap. A bank touching the ledger for a fingerprint and a bank moving its money through XRP are two different events. One of them happened on a practice network in 2025, the other hasn't happened yet.
And I understand wanting the receipt. You've earned the right to want it. But the receipt has to say what you say it is. Now, go back to the man reading the slide, same video, minute five.
This is coming straight from the BIS. They're not saying that every bank in the world needs to own 19,000 XRP. Okay, that's not what this chart says.
He said it himself. Not every bank needs 19,000 XRP. That's not what the chart says. He read the slide right. The title didn't.
And the title is what 46,000 people saw before they ever pressed play. So, here's what the slide is. It's not a shopping list. It's not nothing either. It's a fuel receipt from a test drive and the car was the XRP ledger and it ran.
That goes on the ledger's resume. It does not go on the coin's balance sheet. Here's what I check now from the couch every time a number like that shows up. First, find the page, not the video about the page, the actual page. This one is public, it's a PDF and it took me under a minute to read the stamps and the footnotes.
Personal measurements, Devnet, not an endorsement. They're printed there for exactly this reason. Three, ask one question. Is the coin the fuel or the cargo? Fuel gets burned a millionth at a time.
Cargo is what somebody had to buy and hold. Every Bank for International Settlement document so far has XRP as the fuel. What the slide doesn't settle is whether any central bank ever runs this for real. The paper calls it a prototype and as of October 26, 2026, nobody has said otherwise. The number was real, the sentence around it was made up.
So tell me in the comment section, have you ever seen the actual slide before this video? Just a simple yes or no. One slide, one paper, one box next to the chart. That's all it took to turn 19,998 XRP from a gas gauge into a shopping list and 46,000 people bought the shopping list story. I'd rather you be the ones who read the box.
Going through the actual page and what you actually own and why before any money moves is what we do together inside of SGS systems at Altcoin Pro. It's for people holding $50,000 or more who've never had somebody sit down with them and walk them through the whole thing. If you're not there yet, that's fine, keep watching these videos. They're free and we're not going to stop making them. If this is money that you and your spouse decide on together, bring them on.
It's the first link in the description, click it, get yourself booked a call. And crypto carries risk and past performance doesn't guarantee future results. This is education, not financial advice and you know what to do. Stay bullish. I'll see you at the top.
Education and commentary only, not financial advice. Crypto is volatile and you can lose money. Do your own research and speak to a qualified advisor before making investment decisions. Figures and quotes are as reported in the video on October 31, 2026 and may have changed since.


