Render (RENDER) Down 80%: Why Network Growth Hasn't Lifted the Price

Render holders, I want to start with two numbers that don't seem to belong in the same sentence. On the 10th September 2026, the Render Network said it had crossed 80 million frames rendered. And yet, in early October 2026, the Render token was changing hands at around $2. That's according to traders post on X. Now, back in March 2024, it traded about $12, and that's a fall of more than 80%.

So, 80 million frames rendered and the price is down over 80%. If you own Render, here's why more AI work hasn't saved the price. The burn math explains a lot of it, right? And once you've seen it, you'll know exactly what to watch from here, because this coin has a better backstory than most. It started in Hollywood, then AI moved in.

The network works. Real artists actually use it. So, why is the token shrinking? Stick with me, guys, because the answer isn't that the project is fake, and there's a link in the description that I'll come back to before the 5-minute mark. It's for anyone who's ever held a good project through a bad chart and had no idea what to do next.

Let's be honest, that's one of the most frustrating feelings in crypto. We do our homework, we pick a coin with a real product, the news keeps getting better, and the price goes the other way. Then, we don't know whether to trust the story or the chart. So, we either freeze or we sell at exactly the wrong moment. So, let me take you back to where Render came from, all right?

Because it pretty much explains everything that follows. So, here's the man who built it, introducing himself at the Blender conference in Amsterdam in September 2026.

My name is Jules Urbach. I'm the CEO and founder of OTOY. Um we're a computer graphics company. We also um are partnered with another company I started called uh the Render Network, which is a GPU uh decentralized compute system.

A GPU is a graphics chip, right? The part of a computer built to draw picture. And rendering is the slow job turning a 3D scene into finished frames. The way a like a studio film turns digital modes into shots you see on screen. This is long before any token or Jules Urbach was actually working in film visual effects.

So, in 2018, the All Stage AWE, he explained the problem he set out to fix. Check this out.

Rendering, uh typically rendering for films at highest end has been a pretty laborious process. Back when I was working uh initially on visual effects on Transformers, uh I would render one frame in 40 hours. And we created a tool uh called Octane Render. The initial work that I was doing around GPU rendering enabled me to speed up that process for films.

40 hours for one frame. Film runs at 24 frames a second, so you can see why the studios needed a faster way. Octane, OTOY's renderer, all right, used graphic chips to speed that work up. But even OTOY couldn't get his hands on enough of these chips. It's the same 2018 talk.

He actually explained where the token came in. Check this out.

And Amazon's a partner on uh you know, on our network, but we actually run out of GPUs all the time on the public cloud. So, Render was introduced last year as a Ethereum-backed token system that allows us to take the same exact GPU jobs that customers actually pay for on on Amazon and then send that out to anyone with a GPU that's on the network.

So, that's the origin in his own words, all right? They kept running out of graphic chips on the big cloud services while millions of gaming computers and design machines, they just sat idle for hours at a time. The token launched in 2017 to pay the people who owned those idle machines to do real rendering work. As always, guys, this is not financial advice. Please do your own research, but we're going to get really deep into this today, so stay tuned.

Roll the intro.

[music]

Welcome back, bull runs. If you're new to the channel, please please hit that subscribe button. It does help us along way. And if you're not new to the channel, thank you for your support, but you do me one favor and check that you are subscribed. All right, here's what I want you to take from the origin story.

Render really does solve a real problem, all right? And a coin can do that and still be a painful thing to hold at the same time. So, those are two separate questions, and a lot of us mix them up. Am I telling you to buy Render? Absolutely not, all right?

There may be better opportunities for your situation. I don't know. I'm not going to tell you to buy any token. But what I am saying is that a good project and good holding are not the same thing. Most of us were never shown how to tell them apart, and that's probably the main issue in the crypto world.

That's exactly what our altcoin course is for, by the way. It actually helps you write down why you hold a coin, what would make you add, and what would make you walk away before the charts start arguing. So, here's the easy next step. Click the link down below. I'm going to be going deep into this video, but you can click it while we talk.

Fill in a short form, then book your free 15-minute call, and one of the team is going to go through your own strategy and your own situation with you. It costs zero to do that, guys, all right? You literally just pick a time that suits you. There's no obligation. Then you can decide for yourself if you want to carry on.

Guys, if you're on a mobile phone, hit the more button, the link's going to appear. I won't go too much into it. If you want to take the next step and be in the right room, join us in there. So, let's start with a simple version. An artist has a scene that would take their own computer days to render.

They upload it to the render network, the network splits the job up, and then sends the frames out to people around the world who connected their graphics chip. These are people called node operators. The frames come back, the artist pays, and the node operators get rewarded. Here's a real example from Render Zone post, right? And this is in October 2026.

Render said a creative team called Sturdy rendered 22,000 frames of concert visuals for Rauw Alejandro and the Latin Grammys. All right? Their own estimate on the local machine was 10 days, and on the Render Network, it actually took under 24 hours. That's where Jules Urbach actually says it really shines, all right? Here he is again in Amsterdam, but check this one out.

It's really, really important.

It's especially useful when you're doing like massive large-format renders, 18K. That's sort of where we see a lot of benefits and scale from having thousands of GPUs that are available for um very low cost.

So, that's really the product here. Thousands of graphic chips at a low cost. Next, we're going to look at the token itself, right? So, in late 2023, Render switched to something called burn and mint equilibrium. In September 2026, the network explained it in one short post.

Here's what that means. When an artist pays for a job, that payment is turned into Render. 5% service fee comes off, and the rest of these tokens are burned. Burn just means destroyed for good, so they leave the supply. That's the burn side.

On the other side, new tokens are minted on a schedule and paid out to the people who keep the network running. Now, that's the mint side. So, two forces push against each other. Usage burns coins, which is just the word for newly minted coins. Add them, right?

In December 2025, Solana's Breakpoint conference, Sunny Lu actually from the Render Network Foundation gave the scoreboard. Watch this.

Since Breakpoint last year, we have 63 million cumulative frames rendered to date with over a third of those in 2025. We've onboarded 40% more rendering compute power, launched a separate dedicated compute subnet, funded a record 276 artist grants, and passed four community proposals, and over 1 million cumulative render has now been burnt.

Over a million render burnt in total from the start of model to December 2025. Now, that sounds like a huge amount until you hear the other side. Here's Tristan Ready, the foundation's head of operations at Render Coin in Hollywood in April 2025. Check this out.

So, essentially, the foundation's been running for over two calendar years, and BME was launched right towards the end of 2023. So, we had our first year of emissions come through last year in 2024, and um 9.1 million in total, of which uh 6.8 million render was sort of allocated for network operations ultimately.

So, put those two side by side. In 2024, 9.1 million new render were emitted, even counting only what the foundation actually paid out, and about 3.2 million, that's roughly three times everything burnt under the model by December 2025, which was just over 1 million. That's the heart of it, right? More work means more burning, but if the burning is smaller than what's paid out, the number of coins in circulation keeps growing. And the people receiving these new coins, especially node operators with electricity bills to pay, often have a good reason to sell them.

There's an independent account on X that tracks renders burnt every single day. It isn't Render's official account, so please take that exact number with a pinch of salt, but the picture it paints is very clear. Now, on the 8th of October 2026, it counted about 6 and 1/2 thousand dollars of render burnt that day, which it said was about 20% of that day's new coins. On the 3rd of October, it was about 42%. Now, in the post I read from late August to 8th of October, burns were covering only a part of the new supply, never all of it, and here's the twist most people miss.

Artists pay for rendering by the amount of GPU power they use. And Render prices them ordinary money using a measure of GPU power called OctaneBench. So, a job costs about the same in dollars for whatever the token is doing. If the price of Render halves, the network burns twice as many tokens for the same job. If the price doubles, it burns half as many.

That's a clever stabilizer because it means the thing that really matters isn't frames or headlines, it's actually how many dollars people spend on the network. And that's compared with how many coins are created and sold. So, you might be wondering what about token unlocks, right? Where big chunks of coins held by early investors are released. Well, on Render, the new supply that matters is the steady emissions.

I didn't find a big schedule unlocking Render's own post up to the 9th of October 2026. You'll see the claim on social media that Render's network is busier than any point in history. So, let's check that against Render's own numbers. Back in December 2025, it had rendered 63 million frames, and by the 19th of July 2026, that was 77 million. And by the 10th of September 2026, it was 80 million.

That works out to roughly 2 million frames a month between December 2025 and July 2026, and about 3 million in 7 or so weeks after that. So, the network has grown steadily, which is good, but on Render's own frame counts, I cannot see a sudden boom. And frames only tell you about rendering. The bigger story people are betting on is AI. Render has added a second line of business instead of only rendering frames, the same kind of idle graphic chips can run AI, all right?

And in December 2025 at the same Breakpoint Conference, Foundation gave it a name. Check this out.

One last thing, rendering was just the beginning.

[snorts]

It is my pleasure to introduce you all to Dispersed, our customer-facing brand for the compute subnet. It's live right now at dispersed.com. And here it is, processing generative AI models on decentralized GPUs. That this is kind of a big deal.

Dispersed is Render's AI computing service, right? It's a subnet, it's just a separate section of the network with its own customers. Now, in September 2026, Render described it as a single line. Inference is the moment an AI model actually does its job and when somebody asks it a question and demand for that is real. So on the 26th of September 2026, the asset manager Grayscale posted that AI agents use five to 50 times more compute tokens than a typical chatbot.

And actually said demand keeps climbing. Now compute tokens there just means units of AI work. It's not crypto coins, right? So to be clear, Grayscale wasn't talking about Render specifically, it was talking about compute in general. Render seems to be preparing for more work too.

On the 25th of September 2026, it opened a new round of application for people to join this rendering pool with their own graphic chip. What about the figure you may have seen that AI jobs make up 35 to 40% of the network? Well, I looked for it in Render's own reports and posts and I actually couldn't find it. It appears that the post were individual accounts. It might be right, but treat it as unconfirmed until Render publishes it.

All right, what Render's Foundation did say, and this was at the Render coin in April 2025, is that in the first three months of 2025, the network processed more than twice as many AI jobs as the whole of 2024. That's massive growth, but from a small starting point. So, here's the risk I would want any Render holders to understand. First, the supply. As long as new coins outnumber burned coins, every buyer has to absorb the extra supply before the price can rise.

Second, the scale. A few thousand dollars of burns on a typical day is real money, but it's small next to the amount of Render that changes hands in exchanges. In my view, speculation moves the price far more than usage does. Third, the competition. Render isn't the only network selling spare graphic chips and the big cloud companies keep adding capacity.

If GPU rental prices fall, the dollars flowing through Render actually could fall with them. Now fourth, there's the question of dependence. Render is closely tied to OTOY and to Jules Urbach. So that link is a strength for its software, but it's also a single point of reliance. And fifth, a practical warning.

In early October 2026, a wave of posts on X actually asked Render holders to cast a vote for a listing through shortened links. Those didn't come from Render's official account and never connect your wallet to a link like that. Now I can hear some of you saying it, right? If the network keeps growing, surely the price has to catch up eventually. Maybe, but not automatically.

Growth only helps the price if the dollars spent on the network grow faster than the coins being paid out. Until that happens, a busy network and falling token can sit side by side. So, what would I keep an eye on? Well, without guessing at prices, the first is the burn ratio. That's burns divided by new coins.

If you ever see a stretch of where Render burns more than it mints week after week, then that's a genuine change of the story and it would be worth paying attention to. Secondly, I'd watch the frame count. Render posts its milestones on X, so compare the gaps between them. A faster pace means real work. Third, I'd look for named AI customers on Disperse.

I don't mean promises, I mean actual companies saying they're running real jobs there and they're actually paying for it. And fourth, any community proposal that changes emissions Render holders vote on those. So, so that's the most direct lever on supply. And one date for the rendering side, right? Render says Blender 5.3 during November 2026 brings Splats.

All right, that's a newer way of capturing real places in 3D to the Cycles render that Render runs. That could mean new work for the network. So, drop me a comment, guys. Tell me what you thought Render was before this video, a graphics tool, an AI coin, or just a ticker. If you'd like knowing how a coin actually works before you decide, well, I'm going to keep making videos like this.

So, make sure you jump into the network that we built. It has grown a long way from that idea. The link is down below. Whether the token rewards people holding it is a separate question. Crypto carries risk and past results are no guarantee of future ones, guys.

This is purely educational, it's not a financial video. And as always, stay bullish. Oh.